Working Paper: Putting the IT in AudIT Risk: IT Complexity and IT Auditor Mitigation

Paper Authors: Jake Sigler,  Preeti Choudhary, and Vikram Ramadas

Abstract: This study examines the impact a public company’s information technology (IT) complexity from financial reporting systems has on audit risk. Using proprietary data from the PCAOB, we develop two composite scores of IT complexity. We validate that higher IT complexity is associated with greater core audit effort, fees, relatively more IT audit effort, and more auditor identified risks. Despite our finding that the auditor identifies more audit risk for clients with complex IT systems, we find the auditor is unable to, on average, fully address all the audit risks stemming from IT complexity, even after controlling for the audit risks identified. We find ways to improve audit quality related to IT. Specifically, altering the amount of IT audit effort in the early phase of the audit and staffing more experienced IT audit managers can address some of these risks. Finally, we find staffing experienced IT audit managers has benefits beyond audit quality, as they are also associated with better reliability of the client’s IT systems. Overall, this study quantifies the risk of IT complexity on audits and underscores the importance of audit planning and staffing in addressing these risks. 

Download Paper

Disclaimer

The economic research fellows and staff economists generate high-quality working papers that inform the oversight activities of the PCAOB and are disseminated to stimulate discussion and critical comment to the benefit of the public. Working papers are preliminary materials that have not been approved by the Board and reflect only the views of the author(s).

The research topics of economic research fellows, including a description of any nonpublic data sets required for research, are presented to the Board for approval and research papers are reviewed to confirm that the topic of the paper is consistent with the researcher's proposal. That review does not, however, encompass an evaluation of the conclusions reached by researchers.