Objective
Consider how PCAOB quality control (QC) standards should be revised to enhance and strengthen requirements related to a firm’s QC system.
Most Recent Action
The Board adopted amendments to QC 1000 and related amendments to the QC reporting rule and PCAOB forms to help reduce compliance costs and better align QC 1000 with other quality management standards while maintaining the investor protection benefits of QC 1000.
The principal amendments included:
- Rescinding the “design-only” requirement so that QC 1000 imposes requirements only on firms that are required to comply with applicable professional and legal requirements with respect to any “engagement” as defined in QC 1000 (QC 1000.06 and .07d);
- Providing increased flexibility in filling certain specified roles in the QC system, by permitting roles to be assigned to non-firm personnel and divided among multiple individuals (QC 1000.12);
- Rescinding the requirement to have an External QC Function (“EQCF”) (QC 1000.28);
- Narrowing and simplifying communication requirements relating to metrics that the firm communicates to external parties about its audit practice, firm personnel, or engagements (QC 1000.53e);
- With respect to identified engagement deficiencies, requiring evaluation of whether similar engagement deficiencies exist on other engagements only if the identified deficiency resulted or could result in (i) a failure to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support the conclusion reached on an engagement or (ii) an inappropriate overall conclusion on the subject matter of an engagement (QC 1000.68d);
- Revising the definition of QC deficiency to make clear that, when firms have implemented more than one quality response to address the same quality risk, they can take those other quality responses (e.g., compensating responses) into account when determining whether a QC deficiency exists (QC 1000.A8);
- Allowing firms to select the date as of which they annually evaluate the effectiveness of their QC system, rather than requiring firms to evaluate as of September 30 (QC 1000.77);
- Revising the QC system evaluation conclusions to align more closely with the conclusions in other quality management standards, while retaining a structured process, including specified factors for consideration, to guide the evaluation (QC 1000.77 and .78); and
- Simplifying the requirements for retention of QC system documentation and abbreviating the retention period from seven to five years (QC 1000.84 and .86).
Background
The new standard, QC 1000, A Firm’s System of Quality Control, replaces the quality control standards that were adopted by the Board on an interim, transitional basis in 2003 from QC standards originally developed and issued by the AICPA. QC 1000 is an integrated, risk-based standard that includes establishing quality objectives, identifying and assessing quality risks to the achievement of the quality objectives, designing and implementing quality responses to address the quality risks, and monitoring the firm’s QC system and remediating any deficiencies. The new standard encourages an ongoing feedback loop to drive continuous improvement of the QC system. The new standard requires an annual evaluation of the system and annual reporting to the PCAOB on new, non-public Form QC.
The related amendments expand the auditor’s responsibility to respond to deficiencies on engagements under an amended and retitled AS 2901, Responding to Engagement Deficiencies After Issuance of the Auditor’s Report, and related amendments to our attestation standards for broker-dealer engagements. In addition, the related amendments rescind the interim ethics and independence standard, ET 102, Integrity and Objectivity, and replace it with a new standard, EI 1000, Integrity and Objectivity, to better align our ethics requirements with the scope, approach, and terminology of QC 1000.
Status
On September 9, 2026, the Board adopted amendments to certain provisions of QC 1000 and related amendments to the QC reporting rule and PCAOB forms.
QC 1000 and the related amendments to PCAOB standards, rules, and forms adopted in 2024 will take effect on December 15, 2026. If approved by the SEC, the amendments to QC 1000 adopted on September 9, 2026 and the related amendments to a PCAOB rule and PCAOB forms will also take effect on December 15, 2026.
Once a firm has been subject to the requirement to design, implement, and operate a QC 1000-compliant QC system for at least five consecutive months, the firm is required to annually evaluate and conclude on the effectiveness of its QC system, as of an evaluation date selected by the firm. This five-month period begins on the earlier of the effective date of QC 1000 or the date when a firm must comply with the requirements of QC 1000 (i.e., the date when a firm becomes subject to applicable professional and legal requirements with respect to any engagement).
If a firm is required to perform an annual evaluation of its QC system, the firm must file with the Board a report on such evaluation on Form QC no later than 60 days after the firm’s evaluation date.
Resources
2018 SAG Meeting
- SAG Discussion: Governance and Leadership in Firm Quality Control Systems
- Briefing Paper: Quality Control: Governance and Leadership
For more discussions about quality control in prior SAG meetings, visit the SAG Archive.