Working Paper: The Landscape of Auditing in U.S. Capital Markets

Paper Authors: Thomas Bourveau, Jonathan Fluharty-Jaidee, Juan Mao, Min Ren, Martin Schmalz, and Joshua T. White

Abstract: We document trends in landscape of public-company auditing over 2003 to 2023, focusing on the distribution of audits across auditor size groups, auditor switching patterns, and audit firm entry and exit. We find remarkable stability in the Big 4’s proportion of total audit fees but substantial declines in their presence among Nasdaq and OTC issuers. Auditor switching rates decline over time among Big 4 and Mid 2 clients while remaining persistently high among clients of smaller audit firms, suggesting increased differentiation in auditor-client relationships. Although PCAOB registrations surge in the first half of our sample, largely due to the 2009 broker-dealer mandate, total registered firms decline sharply after 2010. Most deregistering firms were minimally involved in auditing public issuers, suggesting that their exit does not necessarily reduce auditor availability. Our results highlight the importance of understanding firm-level audit activity, rather than registration numbers alone, when evaluating regulatory impacts on public issuer audits.

Download the paper

Disclaimer

The economic research fellows and staff economists generate high-quality working papers that inform the oversight activities of the PCAOB and are disseminated to stimulate discussion and critical comment to the benefit of the public. Working papers are preliminary materials that have not been approved by the Board and reflect only the views of the author(s).

The research topics of economic research fellows, including a description of any nonpublic data sets required for research, are presented to the Board for approval and research papers are reviewed to confirm that the topic of the paper is consistent with the researcher's proposal. That review does not, however, encompass an evaluation of the conclusions reached by researchers.