Data Points: Financial Restatements and Auditor Turnover

October 2025

From 2005 to 2024, Big R financial restatements occurred at a rate of around 3% per year.1 On average, just under 30% of these restatements followed an auditor change in the previous year. As a point of reference, the average annual auditor-change rate across the broader population, which includes companies without Big R restatements, was 11%.

Findings

Figure 1 plots the number of companies with Big R restatements by announcement (calendar) year, along with the subset that changed auditors. For this analysis, a company is classified as having an Auditor Change if it switched auditors within the one-year period before the restatement announcement date; otherwise, it is classified as No Auditor Change. Figure 2 shows the annual percentage of the broader population of companies that changed auditors, including those without Big R restatements.

  • Figure 1 shows that, over the 2005 to 2024 period, an average of 29% of companies with Big R restatements reported an auditor change in the year preceding the restatement.
  • Figure 2 shows that, over 2005 to 2024, the auditor-change rate across the broader population ranged from 8% to 13% (averaging 11%), which is below the auditor-change rate of 29% among companies with Big R restatements.

Data

Office of Economic and Risk Analysis staff obtained audit opinion, financial restatement, and auditor dismissal data from Audit Analytics. Our analysis generally excludes 1940 Act filers, benefits plans, and restatements related to the SEC’s 2021 Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”).

Figure 1. Big R Restatements and Auditor Turnover

Figure 2. Auditor-Change Rate Across the Broader Population

1 A Big R restatement refers to a restatement disclosed in an SEC Form 8-K, Item 4.02. 

About Data Points

The PCAOB’s Office of Economic and Risk Analysis (OERA) publishes Data Points to provide stakeholders with informative data points on relevant topics. This document represents the views of PCAOB staff and not necessarily those of the Board. It is not a rule, policy, or statement of the Board.